Trump admin cuts $4M in Princeton funding related to climate research
The Trump administration slashes $4M in Princeton funding associated with climate research The Department of Commerce faulted the funding agreements as not aligned to the administration’s priorities The Department of Commerce on Tuesday said it would be reducing $4 million in funding for climate research at Princeton University.
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick wrote in a news release the reductions were made “following a comprehensive, careful, and thorough analysis of The department explained the monetary awards given earlier to Princeton by NOAA, such as the Cooperative Institute for Modeling the Earth System (CIMES), “are no longer in support of the program goals of NOAA, a sub-agency of the Department of Commerce, and are no longer consistent with the priorities of the Trump administration.”
Princeton did not return a call from Fox News Digital. The CIMES website says the program “has contributed to the development of oceanic and atmospheric models, conducted research on climate and biogeochemical cycling and educated several generations of postdoctoral researchers and graduate students.”
READ MORE:Babydog Justice makes Agriculture Committee debut
The commerce department, nonetheless, replied that the CIMES accord “encourages sensational and implausible climate dangers, leading to a phenomenon known as ‘climate anxiety,’ which has risen dramatically among America’s youth.”
The department went on to add that the Climate Risks and Interactive Sub-seasonal to Seasonal Predictability agreement “indicates that the Earth will experience a substantial change in its water supply due to global warming,” and the Advancing Prediction agreement “has utilized its resources to determine risks linked to climate change, such as purported changes in precipitation patterns and sea level rise,” the release added.
“It also works towards counteracting coastal flooding as other focused research endeavors are dealing with the issue,” the release goes on.
the Department’s financial assistance programs against the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) existing program goals.”
The department further stated that the elimination of these funds from Princeton, effective June 30, “will streamline and reduce the cost and size of the Federal Government, consistent with President Trump’s promise for his Administration. The Department of Commerce is delivering on that promise.”
The department added that the administration’s objective in cancelling these funds will conserve U.S. taxpayer dollars, and it will “continue reviewing its outstanding cooperative agreements, grant awards, and other financial assistance on an individualized basis in order to prevent wasteful government expenditures — whether they be to Princeton or any other recipient.”
Colleges and universities nationwide have been in a state of heightened anxiety since Trump started probing schools for supposed antisemitic harassment and discrimination, withholding federal funding for some schools that permitted anti-Israel protests on campus since the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel
FAQ:
Why was Princeton’s climate research funding cut?
The Trump administration eliminated $4 million in federal funding previously allocated to Princeton University for climate-related research. This was part of broader budget cuts targeting environmental and climate science programs across multiple agencies.
What programs were affected?
The funding reduction impacted Princeton’s climate research initiatives, which may have included projects on climate modeling, renewable energy, or carbon emissions studies. Specific details depend on the grants awarded by agencies like NOAA, NASA, or the Department of Energy.
Was this part of a larger trend?
Yes. The Trump administration repeatedly proposed significant cuts to climate science funding, arguing for reduced spending on environmental regulations and a focus on fossil fuel development. Similar cuts were made to EPA, NOAA, and NASA climate programs.
How did Princeton respond?
Princeton likely sought alternative funding sources (private grants, philanthropic support) or adjusted research priorities. Many universities affected by federal cuts turned to state governments or industry partnerships to continue critical research.
Did the funding ever get restored?
Subsequent administrations (e.g., Biden) reversed many Trump-era climate funding cuts, but restoration depended on congressional approvals and new budget allocations.
Where can I find more details?
Check Princeton’s official statements, federal budget documents, or news reports from reputable sources like The New York Times, Science Magazine, or Inside Higher Ed.
coronavirus pandemic,minorities,pandemic,boston,homelessness,unemployment,rent,evictions,
Copyright hubnews1 Recorder, 2025
