SCOTUS justice shreds Trump’s attacks on judges in stunning rebuke
SCOTUS justice shreds Trump’s attacks on judges in stunning rebuke The sitting Supreme Court justice, in an unusual public statement about Trump’s impact on the judiciary without directly naming him, appeared to condemn Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s insults,
As he put it last night before a seated audience of federal judges and lawyers, Jackson said, quote, “The attacks are not random. They seem to be designed to intimidate those of us who serve in this important capacity, and they ultimately risk undermining our Constitution and the rule of law.
I can report that I was at the event last night, and the crowd was intently focused on the justice’s words. Jackson was set to make brief remarks before engaging in a lengthy conversation with a judge about his recent memoirs on the judiciary, before focusing on this conversation about his memoir. At the end of the evening,
the crowd gave Jackson a standing ovation the same night Justice Jackson made those comments. Donald Trump was in Alabama and here he is today. The courts are trying to stop me from doing what I was elected to do, but they have to let us do what the voters want us to do. The judges are interfering,
presumably on the grounds of due process. This morning, Trump opened a new front against a different perceived enemy with a legally dubious threat to enlist the IRS in his crusade against Harsaw. Trump promised to, quote, strip Harvard of its tax-exempt status, as the Times reports, federal law prohibits the president from directing the IRS to conduct electioneering. At this point,
it’s unclear if the IRS will follow Trump’s direction today. Harvard has called the move, quote, illegal. But let’s step back and think about the bigger picture. This week, the New York Times reported on Donald Trump’s, quote, assault on legal restrictions as the United States has ever experienced them, and denounced the president’s increasingly authoritarian tactics, according to legal experts,
including using the power of the presidency to attack perceived enemies. To discuss all of this. Joining me now is Professor Deborah Archer, president of the ACLU and a law professor at New York University. Deborah is also the author of a brand new book, dividing the lines on how transportation infrastructure reinforces racism
Inequality. Also at the table with America is Molly Jongfast, a special correspondent with Vanity Fair and an MSNBC political contributor. Deborah, let’s start with Justice Jackson’s remarks last night. How extraordinary is it for a sitting member of the Court to speak so candidly about the state of the judiciary and the interaction between the administration and the judiciary? It’s extraordinary.
👉👉 Open this link to read more articles.👈👈
We’ve seen it a couple of times. Recently with this administration. What I think. She did. Was really important for. HER. PLATFORM TO. SAY SOMETHING. She we. were watching. And documented,
And she is this administration taking steps to bring the legal system? Under the president? Thumb, and she. Undermines the ability. To hold it to account. To protect the principle. of the law. We’re seeing her do that with challenge, challenging. the integrity of people on both sides of the bench. So she’s challenged the legal institutions that have cases. She doesn’t do that. Agree with nonprofits.
And she’s called out the Justices and the judges. By NAME. So Deborah recently alluded to the idea that other justices have talked about this. Molly, we know that Chief Justice John Roberts issued a very brief statement a few weeks ago. It was, I think, a little more detailed in the terms of the statement.
He cited this quote from Alexander Hamilton that if we lose an independent judiciary, then we have lost the Constitution. How important was that for Molly to say, and does it resonate more than the very brief statement the Chief Justice made a few weeks ago? Well, I think everything. The Supreme Court is the Supreme Court. It resonates. And because we see it. Donald Trump. Talked about. Due process, right? The reason for that.
The decision of the process. WAS a non-zero. And I think that. Well, there. There have been a couple of decisions around that, but there was. One that. In fact, I think there were. Nine zeros. So it’s clearly that. Seen that. He understands.
And I think it’s important to remember. He watches the polling. He knows what’s going on. He knows what he’s doing is not popular. And I think the people we’ve seen stand up, we’ve seen Jackson stand up, and we’ve seen Harris both say that these are guardrails. We need them. We still, we’re seeing black women stand up on the right. And say what no one else has the courage to say,
which is that we’re in a very dangerous moment in American democracy. And I think that’s what she’s saying. And she’s saying that because she sees that it’s dangerous. Right? Also, Tokitenji Brown Jackson, Chief The sitting Supreme Court justice, in an unusual public statement about Trump’s impact on the judiciary without directly naming him, appeared to condemn Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s insults,
As he put it last night before a seated audience of federal judges and lawyers, Jackson said, quote, “The attacks are not random. They seem to be designed to intimidate those of us who serve in this important capacity, and they ultimately risk undermining our Constitution and the rule of law.
I can report that I was at the event last night, and the crowd was intently focused on the justice’s words. Jackson was set to make brief remarks before engaging in a lengthy conversation with a judge about his recent memoirs on the judiciary, before focusing on this conversation about his memoir. At the end of the evening,
the crowd gave Jackson a standing ovation the same night Justice Jackson made those comments. Donald Trump was in Alabama and here he is today. The courts are trying to stop me from doing what I was elected to do, but they have to let us do what the voters want us to do. The judges are interfering,
presumably on the grounds of due process. This morning, Trump opened a new front against a different perceived enemy with a legally dubious threat to enlist the IRS in his crusade against Harsaw. Trump promised to, quote, strip Harvard of its tax-exempt status, as the Times reports, federal law prohibits the president from directing the IRS to conduct electioneering. At this point,
it’s unclear if the IRS will follow Trump’s direction today. Harvard has called the move, quote, illegal. But let’s step back and think about the bigger picture. This week, the New York Times reported on Donald Trump’s, quote, assault on legal restrictions as the United States has ever experienced them, and denounced the president’s increasingly authoritarian tactics, according to legal experts,
including using the power of the presidency to attack perceived enemies. To discuss all of this. Joining me now is Professor Deborah Archer, president of the ACLU and a law professor at New York University. Deborah is also the author of a brand new book, dividing the lines on how transportation infrastructure reinforces racism
Inequality. Also at the table with America is Molly Jongfast, a special correspondent with Vanity Fair and an MSNBC political contributor. Deborah, let’s start with Justice Jackson’s remarks last night. How extraordinary is it for a sitting member of the Court to speak so candidly about the state of the judiciary and the interaction between the administration and the judiciary? It’s extraordinary.
We’ve seen it a couple of times. Recently with this administration. What I think. She did. Was really important for. HER. PLATFORM TO. SAY SOMETHING. She we. were watching. And documented,
And she is this administration taking steps to bring the legal system? Under the president? Thumb, and she. Undermines the ability. To hold it to account. To protect the principle. of the law. We’re seeing her do that with challenge, challenging. the integrity of people on both sides of the bench. So she’s challenged the legal institutions that have cases. She doesn’t do that. Agree with nonprofits.
And she’s called out the Justices and the judges. By NAME. So Deborah recently alluded to the idea that other justices have talked about this. Molly, we know that Chief Justice John Roberts issued a very brief statement a few weeks ago. It was, I think, a little more detailed in the terms of the statement.
He cited this quote from Alexander Hamilton that if we lose an independent judiciary, then we have lost the Constitution. How important was that for Molly to say, and does it resonate more than the very brief statement the Chief Justice made a few weeks ago? Well, I think everything. The Supreme Court is the Supreme Court. It resonates. And because we see it. Donald Trump. Talked about. Due process, right? The reason for that.
The decision of the process. WAS a non-zero. And I think that. Well, there. There have been a couple of decisions around that, but there was. One that. In fact, I think there were. Nine zeros. So it’s clearly that. Seen that. He understands.
And I think it’s important to remember. He watches the polling. He knows what’s going on. He knows what he’s doing is not popular. And I think the people we’ve seen stand up, we’ve seen Jackson stand up, and we’ve seen Harris both say that these are guardrails. We need them. We still, we’re seeing black women stand up on the right. And say what no one else has the courage to say,
👉👉 Open this link to read more articles.👈👈
which is that we’re in a very dangerous moment in American democracy. And I think that’s what she’s saying. And she’s saying that because she sees that it’s dangerous. Right? Also, Tokitenji Brown Jackson, Chief
criminal justice,wisconsin chief justice patience roggensack,justin amash,justin amash donald trump,justice act,chief justice,chief justice john roberts,white noise for studying,trump’s white house,president trump espionage,trump administration,united states,united states senate,democratic congressman,president trump,beach sounds for relaxation,trump organization,trump putin meeting,trump governors working session,president trump news
FAQ:
Q: What recent statement did a Supreme Court justice make about Trump’s criticism of judges?
A: A sitting U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) justice publicly condemned former President Donald Trump’s attacks on judges, calling them dangerous and unfounded. The rebuke emphasized the importance of judicial independence and respect for the rule of law.
Q: Why is this significant?
A: Supreme Court justices rarely weigh in on political controversies, making this direct criticism notable. It underscores growing concerns over attacks undermining public trust in the judiciary.
Q: How did Trump respond?
A: As of now, Trump has not publicly addressed the justice’s remarks, but he has a history of dismissing such critiques as partisan.
Q: What broader impact could this have?
A: Legal experts suggest such rebukes may reinforce norms of judicial impartiality and deter efforts to delegitimize courts over unfavorable rulings.
Q: Where can I find the full statement?
A: The justice’s comments were reported by major news outlets (e.g., The New York Times, CNN). For exact wording, check official transcripts or court-related publications.
